Messrs. Webley and Co. have some explanation to offer. There does not appear to have been any breach of the Ordinance of Hong Kong which would render the goods liable to seizure under the law of Hong-Kong.
The exporters seem to have applied for a license under section 6 of the Ordinance No. 9 of 1900, which appears to have been the proper course.
4. We think the arms might be delivered up to the exporters on the understanding that they should be re-shipped to England, or to some other place to which the proclamation does not apply.
Nothing further occurs to us.
We have the honour to be,
Your most obedient humble servants,
R.M. Finlay
Toward Carom
OFFICES OF THE C.R.O.
421
Mess". Webley and Co.
explanation to offer.
have some
may
There does not appear
3.
to have been
breach
any
f
the Ordinance
of Hong Kong which would render the
goods liable to seizure under the law
of Hong-Kong.
The exporters seem to have applied
: for a license under section 6
the
f
Ordinance he 9 of 1900,
which
appears
to have been the proper course.
4. We think the arms
might be delivered up
to the exporters
on
the understanding that they should
be
OFFICES
THE CRO
421
be re-shipped to England,
or
to
some
ther place to which the proclamation
does not apply.
کھ
Nothing further
recurs to us.
We have the honour to be,
Fir
Jour
most obedient
humble servants,
RM Finlay
Toward Carom
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.